Many well-intentioned idealists in America still think
the Bushies were doing a good thing when they invaded I
raq, sacking Saddam's palaces and murdering his two sons.
These folks don't seem to understand that GW Bush was
not truly motivated by revenge for his dad, nor was
he interested in bringing 'democracy' to a land whose
original Sumerian settlers had been fashioning equitable
modes of governance at least six millennia before the
Vikings made their first tentative dart across the North
Sea, braving the Labrador Currents to reach the Hudson
Bay in North America.
They refuse to face the fact that it is the neocons'
inane dream of world conquest, propelled by their
anachronistic imperialist ideology and their solidarity
with their Zionist cohorts that is at the root of all
instability in the world today.
So how did the neo-cons come to believe that time was
ripe for fulfilling their dream of world conquest?
A combination of factors had led them to embark on
the pursuit of this dream: First, America's political,
economic and military dominance in the post-Cold War
era satisfied the pre-requisite conditions for its push
in the fourth phase of its expansion. Second, the
dissolution of the Soviet Bloc whetted their appetite
while their zero-casualty exploits in Kosovo and
Yugoslavia put a seal of approval on their fledgling
geopolitical experiment. Third, the rise of China gave
these racist Anglos an excuse to strike preemptively,
since they are still cherishing this deep-seated fear
of having to share the good life and limited resources
with hordes of non-whites led by the Chinese, a fear
that was highlighted in the recent breakdown of the
Cancun talks over agricultural subsidies. Fourth,
the Jewish desire for controlling water resources
and ridding the Palestinians of financial support
from Arabs and Iranians gave their plan the necessary
political impetus on Capitol Hill during the 'smooth'
phase of the war.
From Tony Blair's vantage point on the other side of
the Atlantic, the main contention is that in the
post-colonial world of Asia, Africa and Latin America
many native peoples are still languishing in economic
malaise under 'authoritarian' governments and so these
folks must be missing their old colonial days and simply
waiting for the Brits to return.
Otherwise how do you explain the smug confidence of
a middle-level swashbuckling power like Britain attacking
an ancient civilization like Iraq under false pretenses
and still getting away with it? If the British parliament
really hate Blair's policies with a vengeance as the
hearing officials on Kelly's murder want the credulous
world to believe, they would have gotten rid of Blair
like they had dismissed Chamberlain at the beginning of WWII.
As it is, the British hearings are sounding more like a
cunning facade providing a cover for Blair's tactical
retreat. <b>They have not touched the core issue which
is the return of sovereignty to Iraq through a democratic
election process in which Baath party members are allowed
Their real attitude can readily be seen in the case of
Hongkong when on July 1 they instigated a huge
demonstration through their surrogates against the
anti-subversive Article 23 of the Basic Law,
as if to show the world that Hongkongers would welcome
their rule more than that of their own Chinese
brethen in Beijing.
This of course was a disingenuous plot that simply
could not have succeeded.
Hongkong's economic woes are those of a transitional
economy re-adjusting to new economic realities. They
have to do with her new role after China's Gaige Kaifang
began to shift into high gear. The resultant inevitable
changes rendered Hongkong's hitherto entreport status
dispensable, and have absolutely nothing to do with
China's resumption of sovereignty over the colony.
That's why the Closer Economic Partnership Agreement
(CEPA) is so important to the continued prosperity of
both the Mainland and the Hongkong SAR. Its ratification
is as much a political counter-punch to the neo-cons in
Washington and neo-colonialists in London as it is an
economic lifeline thrown to the struggling Hongkongers
bobbing in the raging currents of change.
The demise of the Soviet Union thirteen years ago presented
before the Anglo-Jewish cohorts the unique opportunity to
test their aura of invincibility. Certainly not all Americans
share this false sense of vainglorious omnipotence but their
voices are effectively muffled in the face of zero-casualty
battlefield successes in the Balkans.
Understandably very few Americans are willing to sacrifice
their own welfare for the wild ambitions of the neo-cons,
for inherent in the latter's plan is the dismantling of social
security services and zero taxation for capital gains of the
rich, so much so that all financial resources could be
concentrated in the military-industrial complex to build
absolute dominance in Outer Space. That's why they are so
worked up about the likely successes of Shenzhou manned
missions and so miffed about their implications.
Furthermore, government programs that had ensured social
stability since the days of FDR will be thrown to the
wolves and more Americans will be pushed below the poverty
line with no discernible signs of imminent relief.
One only has to note in today's news that the three Anglo
governments still insist that invading Iraq was the right
decision to make DESPITE their own intelligence confirmation
that no WMDs have been found after months of intensive search
to realize the commitment the neo-cons have made to their
diabolical scheme. Bush, British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw
and Australian PM Howard co-ordinated amongst themselves to
emphazise their solidarity on the same day after the CIA
pronouncement. Amongst the three Anglos, Bush's blueblooded
lineage can even be traced to English King Longshank whose
cruelty against the Scot rebels was so well portrayed in the
movie "Braveheart" starring Mel Gibson. To the Three
Blind Mice, nothing is more important than to coordinate
a race war against China.
These Anglos of course would never openly tell the American
people that their plans for war in March were in fact
independent of the existence of WMD in Iraq. On the
contrary, such invasion plans were premised on their
pre-war finding that Iraq did NOT possess WMD. If
such weapons had existed, do you believe American
General Tommy Franks would have sent his troops rapidly
across the deserts of southern Iraq and spearheaded
them directly into Baghdad?
Even the blind Mr. Magoo can tell by now -- after all
that is said and done -- that the ultimate target of
the neo-cons and neo-colonialists is China. That is
the unspoken cloaked dagger in world diplomatic circles
today. The three must have been able to seal their bond of
commitment by mutually witnessing their shared erectile
excitement in the nude privacy of Bush's Texan sauna room.
They must have gleefully congratulated one another over the
occupation of strategic Iraq, and that's why they had continued
to insist today that their invasion plan was 'on target.'
In their lexicon, 'target' means China, not Iraq.
But of course they cannot utter those words in their camouflage
underwear outside the sauna room, since they still want to
hide their self-induced excitement while laying down strategic
pieces on their China-Encirclement Chessboard, and they definitely
still need China's help in solving irksome problems popping up
from time to time, as in the case of the suddenly-multiplying-
nukes in a place called North Korea.
From the China Daily